Fun Facts About the Name Lee
- Decades of popularity: Lee stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 76 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1955.
- More than 295 thousand babies named Lee: U.S. records list 295,921 babies given the name Lee from 1880 through 2025. Of these, 62,299 girls received the name Lee - about 1 girl for every 4 boys.
What Does the Name Lee Mean?
Lee is an English name meaning "clearing" or "meadow." It comes from the Old English word lēah, which named a wood, glade, or open clearing in a forest. That same word is the source of many English place names and survives in endings such as -ley, -leigh, and -lee. As a surname, Lee was a topographic name for someone who lived at or near a wood or clearing. The given name Lee is a transferred use of that surname, not a name with a separate Old English root.
A second, unrelated origin exists in Ireland: the Gaelic surname Ó Laoidhigh, from laoidh, "poem" or "song," was in some cases anglicized as Lee. The spelling Lee also stands for Chinese 李 (Lǐ) and for the Korean surname 이, often romanized as Yi or Lee. Those are separate surname traditions that happen to share an English spelling; they are not related to the English name or to each other.
Lee Name History & Origins
The English surname Lee developed in the Middle Ages from the Old English element lēah. It is found in place names including Lee in Kent (now part of south London), Lea in Lancashire, and many villages whose names end in -ley or -leigh. A man who took his surname from such a place was identified by the local feature rather than by a trade or a father's name. Because the same word was so common in place naming, the surname arose independently in many parts of England.
Lee is one of a group of English surnames that were later adopted as first names. Surnames began to be used as given names in England in the 1600s, and the practice became widespread in the American South, where a mother's maiden name was often given to a son. Lee was in established use as a given name by the 1800s and was common in the United States by the early 1900s, serving both as a first name and as a middle name for boys. It also came into use as a feminine given name. The surname is widely known from the Confederate general Robert E. Lee (1807 - 1870); the given name has been borne by figures such as the actors Lee Marvin and Lee Remick.
In Ireland and Scotland, Lee sometimes represents an anglicized Gaelic surname rather than the English topographic name, so bearers of the name do not all share a single ancestral line.
How Popular is the Name Lee?
Lee remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1955. Its highest annual birth count was in 1951, and people born that year turn 75 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #5,832 | 21 | 0.0013% |
| 2024 | #5,214 | 25 | 0.0015% |
| 2023 | #5,319 | 24 | 0.0015% |
| 2022 | #5,102 | 26 | 0.0016% |
| 2021 | #7,486 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 2020 | #4,704 | 28 | 0.0017% |
| 2019 | #6,093 | 20 | 0.0012% |
| 2018 | #5,088 | 26 | 0.0015% |
| 2017 | #5,948 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 2016 | #4,398 | 33 | 0.0019% |
| 2015 | #5,585 | 24 | 0.0013% |
| 2014 | #5,726 | 23 | 0.0013% |
| 2013 | #4,833 | 29 | 0.0017% |
| 2012 | #6,024 | 22 | 0.0012% |
| 2011 | #6,466 | 20 | 0.0011% |
| 2010 | #4,681 | 31 | 0.0017% |
| 2009 | #5,026 | 29 | 0.0016% |
| 2008 | #7,597 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 2007 | #6,216 | 22 | 0.0011% |
| 2006 | #4,896 | 29 | 0.0015% |
| 2005 | #5,702 | 22 | 0.0012% |
| 2004 | #3,469 | 43 | 0.0023% |
| 2003 | #3,396 | 43 | 0.0024% |
| 2002 | #3,310 | 42 | 0.0023% |
| 2001 | #2,681 | 56 | 0.0031% |
| 2000 | #2,322 | 67 | 0.0037% |
| 1999 | #1,949 | 81 | 0.0046% |
| 1998 | #1,796 | 87 | 0.0049% |
| 1997 | #1,997 | 72 | 0.0041% |
| 1996 | #1,633 | 94 | 0.0054% |
| 1995 | #1,527 | 102 | 0.0058% |
| 1994 | #1,343 | 125 | 0.0070% |
| 1993 | #1,126 | 159 | 0.0088% |
| 1992 | #1,136 | 156 | 0.0085% |
| 1991 | #1,111 | 162 | 0.0086% |
| 1990 | #956 | 197 | 0.0104% |
| 1989 | #819 | 232 | 0.0126% |
| 1988 | #707 | 269 | 0.0151% |
| 1987 | #746 | 243 | 0.0140% |
| 1986 | #646 | 286 | 0.0167% |
| 1985 | #610 | 310 | 0.0180% |
| 1984 | #533 | 360 | 0.0214% |
| 1983 | #513 | 373 | 0.0223% |
| 1982 | #444 | 485 | 0.0286% |
| 1981 | #414 | 532 | 0.0319% |
| 1980 | #364 | 652 | 0.0393% |
| 1979 | #364 | 622 | 0.0387% |
| 1978 | #414 | 489 | 0.0319% |
| 1977 | #377 | 561 | 0.0366% |
| 1976 | #386 | 532 | 0.0363% |
| 1975 | #360 | 585 | 0.0401% |
| 1974 | #356 | 608 | 0.0414% |
| 1973 | #336 | 658 | 0.0451% |
| 1972 | #333 | 691 | 0.0454% |
| 1971 | #308 | 873 | 0.0525% |
| 1970 | #298 | 970 | 0.0555% |
| 1969 | #257 | 1,134 | 0.0672% |
| 1968 | #239 | 1,160 | 0.0707% |
| 1967 | #248 | 1,140 | 0.0690% |
| 1966 | #241 | 1,211 | 0.0716% |
| 1965 | #237 | 1,300 | 0.0736% |
| 1964 | #248 | 1,272 | 0.0671% |
| 1963 | #225 | 1,479 | 0.0767% |
| 1962 | #233 | 1,380 | 0.0702% |
| 1961 | #222 | 1,494 | 0.0740% |
| 1960 | #218 | 1,531 | 0.0757% |
| 1959 | #213 | 1,549 | 0.0766% |
| 1958 | #200 | 1,696 | 0.0843% |
| 1957 | #192 | 1,834 | 0.0897% |
| 1956 | #184 | 1,937 | 0.0965% |
| 1955 | #183 | 1,816 | 0.0929% |
| 1954 | #216 | 1,357 | 0.0699% |
| 1953 | #255 | 1,015 | 0.0540% |
| 1952 | #256 | 948 | 0.0511% |
| 1951 | #259 | 891 | 0.0495% |
| 1950 | #268 | 818 | 0.0478% |
| 1949 | #270 | 818 | 0.0478% |
| 1948 | #264 | 842 | 0.0496% |
| 1947 | #254 | 857 | 0.0483% |
| 1946 | #248 | 807 | 0.0514% |
| 1945 | #257 | 687 | 0.0526% |
| 1944 | #280 | 600 | 0.0452% |
| 1943 | #285 | 597 | 0.0428% |
| 1942 | #282 | 583 | 0.0432% |
| 1941 | #283 | 520 | 0.0430% |
| 1940 | #283 | 492 | 0.0430% |
| 1939 | #286 | 477 | 0.0435% |
| 1938 | #296 | 450 | 0.0408% |
| 1937 | #298 | 438 | 0.0412% |
| 1936 | #292 | 439 | 0.0422% |
| 1935 | #280 | 474 | 0.0452% |
| 1934 | #307 | 422 | 0.0404% |
| 1933 | #311 | 403 | 0.0400% |
| 1932 | #293 | 457 | 0.0428% |
| 1931 | #302 | 446 | 0.0419% |
| 1930 | #308 | 465 | 0.0413% |
| 1929 | #308 | 474 | 0.0425% |
| 1928 | #291 | 513 | 0.0445% |
| 1927 | #302 | 490 | 0.0411% |
| 1926 | #285 | 542 | 0.0457% |
| 1925 | #292 | 531 | 0.0436% |
| 1924 | #303 | 488 | 0.0391% |
| 1923 | #290 | 494 | 0.0409% |
| 1922 | #291 | 496 | 0.0413% |
| 1921 | #303 | 459 | 0.0372% |
| 1920 | #281 | 543 | 0.0453% |
| 1919 | #289 | 484 | 0.0428% |
| 1918 | #281 | 507 | 0.0438% |
| 1917 | #282 | 479 | 0.0443% |
| 1916 | #275 | 475 | 0.0455% |
| 1915 | #279 | 445 | 0.0452% |
| 1914 | #255 | 405 | 0.0532% |
| 1913 | #272 | 294 | 0.0471% |
| 1912 | #253 | 312 | 0.0559% |
| 1911 | #245 | 258 | 0.0617% |
| 1910 | #256 | 224 | 0.0565% |
| 1909 | #258 | 196 | 0.0564% |
| 1908 | #246 | 197 | 0.0589% |
| 1907 | #245 | 192 | 0.0603% |
| 1906 | #272 | 150 | 0.0508% |
| 1905 | #253 | 165 | 0.0566% |
| 1904 | #267 | 139 | 0.0505% |
| 1903 | #298 | 110 | 0.0420% |
| 1902 | #269 | 134 | 0.0507% |
| 1901 | #305 | 95 | 0.0397% |
| 1900 | #278 | 138 | 0.0460% |
| 1899 | #308 | 94 | 0.0403% |
| 1898 | #293 | 111 | 0.0429% |
| 1897 | #293 | 97 | 0.0414% |
| 1896 | #341 | 73 | 0.0307% |
| 1895 | #283 | 98 | 0.0419% |
| 1894 | #305 | 83 | 0.0372% |
| 1893 | #332 | 66 | 0.0310% |
| 1892 | #326 | 68 | 0.0320% |
| 1891 | #305 | 68 | 0.0367% |
| 1890 | #333 | 58 | 0.0305% |
| 1889 | #272 | 77 | 0.0432% |
| 1888 | #305 | 61 | 0.0342% |
| 1887 | #273 | 60 | 0.0411% |
| 1886 | #354 | 37 | 0.0256% |
| 1885 | #295 | 46 | 0.0346% |
| 1884 | #277 | 48 | 0.0372% |
| 1883 | #241 | 55 | 0.0490% |
| 1882 | #266 | 43 | 0.0399% |
| 1881 | #259 | 39 | 0.0424% |
| 1880 | #300 | 28 | 0.0308% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #727 | 366 | 0.0214% |
| 2024 | #714 | 370 | 0.0216% |
| 2023 | #706 | 376 | 0.0220% |
| 2022 | #699 | 377 | 0.0216% |
| 2021 | #700 | 377 | 0.0216% |
| 2020 | #769 | 313 | 0.0181% |
| 2019 | #783 | 297 | 0.0166% |
| 2018 | #689 | 352 | 0.0194% |
| 2017 | #681 | 369 | 0.0199% |
| 2016 | #664 | 390 | 0.0206% |
| 2015 | #678 | 375 | 0.0196% |
| 2014 | #703 | 349 | 0.0182% |
| 2013 | #668 | 361 | 0.0191% |
| 2012 | #663 | 357 | 0.0188% |
| 2011 | #670 | 353 | 0.0186% |
| 2010 | #676 | 353 | 0.0184% |
| 2009 | #658 | 374 | 0.0189% |
| 2008 | #671 | 361 | 0.0177% |
| 2007 | #638 | 382 | 0.0184% |
| 2006 | #610 | 391 | 0.0190% |
| 2005 | #590 | 384 | 0.0192% |
| 2004 | #557 | 412 | 0.0208% |
| 2003 | #557 | 403 | 0.0204% |
| 2002 | #517 | 439 | 0.0226% |
| 2001 | #464 | 513 | 0.0264% |
| 2000 | #469 | 502 | 0.0256% |
| 1999 | #449 | 510 | 0.0266% |
| 1998 | #404 | 607 | 0.0318% |
| 1997 | #388 | 615 | 0.0326% |
| 1996 | #343 | 721 | 0.0381% |
| 1995 | #330 | 774 | 0.0407% |
| 1994 | #297 | 917 | 0.0475% |
| 1993 | #284 | 990 | 0.0505% |
| 1992 | #255 | 1,128 | 0.0565% |
| 1991 | #229 | 1,299 | 0.0643% |
| 1990 | #213 | 1,450 | 0.0706% |
| 1989 | #188 | 1,545 | 0.0772% |
| 1988 | #157 | 1,784 | 0.0932% |
| 1987 | #154 | 1,811 | 0.0970% |
| 1986 | #145 | 1,932 | 0.1049% |
| 1985 | #142 | 2,006 | 0.1085% |
| 1984 | #124 | 2,164 | 0.1199% |
| 1983 | #138 | 1,917 | 0.1069% |
| 1982 | #123 | 2,204 | 0.1215% |
| 1981 | #123 | 2,215 | 0.1237% |
| 1980 | #125 | 2,209 | 0.1238% |
| 1979 | #129 | 2,079 | 0.1208% |
| 1978 | #133 | 1,980 | 0.1206% |
| 1977 | #133 | 2,014 | 0.1226% |
| 1976 | #138 | 1,874 | 0.1194% |
| 1975 | #137 | 1,859 | 0.1191% |
| 1974 | #124 | 2,115 | 0.1345% |
| 1973 | #123 | 2,106 | 0.1351% |
| 1972 | #125 | 2,259 | 0.1393% |
| 1971 | #128 | 2,472 | 0.1398% |
| 1970 | #118 | 2,791 | 0.1502% |
| 1969 | #118 | 2,762 | 0.1544% |
| 1968 | #106 | 2,868 | 0.1650% |
| 1967 | #103 | 2,961 | 0.1698% |
| 1966 | #107 | 2,964 | 0.1662% |
| 1965 | #116 | 2,773 | 0.1491% |
| 1964 | #117 | 3,037 | 0.1524% |
| 1963 | #119 | 3,015 | 0.1485% |
| 1962 | #115 | 3,260 | 0.1576% |
| 1961 | #122 | 3,126 | 0.1472% |
| 1960 | #116 | 3,432 | 0.1610% |
| 1959 | #115 | 3,508 | 0.1643% |
| 1958 | #114 | 3,517 | 0.1657% |
| 1957 | #105 | 3,588 | 0.1663% |
| 1956 | #104 | 3,509 | 0.1659% |
| 1955 | #96 | 3,606 | 0.1751% |
| 1954 | #96 | 3,566 | 0.1749% |
| 1953 | #93 | 3,584 | 0.1817% |
| 1952 | #92 | 3,655 | 0.1880% |
| 1951 | #92 | 3,682 | 0.1956% |
| 1950 | #91 | 3,611 | 0.2017% |
| 1949 | #93 | 3,562 | 0.2008% |
| 1948 | #93 | 3,445 | 0.1963% |
| 1947 | #92 | 3,676 | 0.2009% |
| 1946 | #91 | 3,346 | 0.2060% |
| 1945 | #87 | 2,942 | 0.2186% |
| 1944 | #85 | 2,929 | 0.2149% |
| 1943 | #91 | 2,789 | 0.1954% |
| 1942 | #87 | 2,922 | 0.2116% |
| 1941 | #81 | 2,744 | 0.2234% |
| 1940 | #80 | 2,623 | 0.2263% |
| 1939 | #78 | 2,589 | 0.2339% |
| 1938 | #80 | 2,575 | 0.2322% |
| 1937 | #78 | 2,499 | 0.2343% |
| 1936 | #76 | 2,418 | 0.2331% |
| 1935 | #80 | 2,426 | 0.2330% |
| 1934 | #79 | 2,378 | 0.2303% |
| 1933 | #79 | 2,301 | 0.2321% |
| 1932 | #86 | 2,284 | 0.2187% |
| 1931 | #90 | 2,123 | 0.2042% |
| 1930 | #82 | 2,361 | 0.2152% |
| 1929 | #85 | 2,209 | 0.2054% |
| 1928 | #87 | 2,282 | 0.2060% |
| 1927 | #86 | 2,390 | 0.2121% |
| 1926 | #85 | 2,313 | 0.2083% |
| 1925 | #82 | 2,537 | 0.2273% |
| 1924 | #83 | 2,420 | 0.2136% |
| 1923 | #85 | 2,359 | 0.2152% |
| 1922 | #83 | 2,371 | 0.2179% |
| 1921 | #86 | 2,354 | 0.2137% |
| 1920 | #82 | 2,321 | 0.2181% |
| 1919 | #82 | 2,189 | 0.2233% |
| 1918 | #86 | 2,159 | 0.2130% |
| 1917 | #85 | 2,004 | 0.2165% |
| 1916 | #83 | 2,016 | 0.2265% |
| 1915 | #84 | 1,916 | 0.2258% |
| 1914 | #84 | 1,451 | 0.2216% |
| 1913 | #78 | 1,228 | 0.2396% |
| 1912 | #78 | 1,030 | 0.2396% |
| 1911 | #67 | 646 | 0.2859% |
| 1910 | #49 | 741 | 0.3815% |
| 1909 | #52 | 584 | 0.3561% |
| 1908 | #51 | 553 | 0.3583% |
| 1907 | #54 | 516 | 0.3514% |
| 1906 | #58 | 436 | 0.3274% |
| 1905 | #49 | 486 | 0.3673% |
| 1904 | #45 | 532 | 0.4152% |
| 1903 | #45 | 477 | 0.4001% |
| 1902 | #46 | 475 | 0.3872% |
| 1901 | #45 | 424 | 0.3982% |
| 1900 | #39 | 675 | 0.4486% |
| 1899 | #50 | 388 | 0.3653% |
| 1898 | #46 | 498 | 0.4059% |
| 1897 | #47 | 453 | 0.4017% |
| 1896 | #48 | 455 | 0.3805% |
| 1895 | #47 | 478 | 0.4072% |
| 1894 | #45 | 455 | 0.3930% |
| 1893 | #46 | 445 | 0.3962% |
| 1892 | #46 | 460 | 0.3769% |
| 1891 | #52 | 342 | 0.3380% |
| 1890 | #44 | 410 | 0.3693% |
| 1889 | #46 | 415 | 0.3753% |
| 1888 | #48 | 430 | 0.3558% |
| 1887 | #44 | 400 | 0.3944% |
| 1886 | #47 | 399 | 0.3602% |
| 1885 | #50 | 348 | 0.3228% |
| 1884 | #43 | 435 | 0.3801% |
| 1883 | #43 | 388 | 0.3708% |
| 1882 | #41 | 427 | 0.3756% |
| 1881 | #44 | 342 | 0.3395% |
| 1880 | #43 | 361 | 0.3267% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.