Fun Facts About the Name Roy
- An all-time favorite: U.S. records show 408,620 boys named Roy from 1880 through 2025.
- Decades of popularity: Roy stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 89 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1968.
- More than 411 thousand babies named Roy: U.S. records list 411,313 babies given the name Roy from 1880 through 2025. Even 2,693 girls received the name Roy - about 1 girl for every 152 boys.
What Does the Name Roy Mean?
Roy is an English and Scottish masculine given name with two distinct derivations. In Scotland it comes from Scottish Gaelic ruadh, meaning "red." The word was used as a byname for a person with red hair or a ruddy complexion, and it forms part of patronymic surnames such as Mac Ruaidh, "son of Ruadh." A separate derivation is the transferred use of the French surname Roy, from Old French roi and Anglo-Norman rei, "king." The Gaelic and French words are unrelated, so the two meanings should not be merged into a single etymology.
Roy Name History & Origins
The Gaelic personal name and byname Ruadh is the earlier strand behind Roy. It described a red-haired or ruddy person and was anglicized in various forms, including Roy. In the Scottish Highlands, the element appears in the nickname of Robert Roy MacGregor, known as Rob Roy (1671 - 1734); his byname came from Gaelic ruadh, "red." Sir Walter Scott's novel Rob Roy (1817) made that nickname widely familiar, but the literary use is separate from the earlier Gaelic name.
The surname Roy developed independently in several places. In France it comes from Old French roi, "king," likely as a nickname or occupational byname. In Scotland and Ireland, the surname can represent Gaelic patronymics based on Ruadh. English speakers began using Roy as a given name through both the Gaelic byname and the transferred surname, and it was established in Britain and North America by the 19th century.
A separate surname Roy, common in Bengal and other parts of India, comes from Sanskrit rāja, "king," through the Prakrit form rāya. That Indian tradition is not the source of the English given name.
How Popular is the Name Roy?
Roy remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1968. Its highest annual birth count was in 1947, and people born that year turn 79 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | #17,287 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2015 | #14,215 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1989 | #7,341 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1988 | #7,015 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1987 | #4,829 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1986 | #7,002 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1985 | #4,603 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1984 | #4,283 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1983 | #4,640 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 1982 | #6,266 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1981 | #5,507 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1980 | #3,582 | 23 | 0.0014% |
| 1979 | #4,572 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 1978 | #4,211 | 17 | 0.0011% |
| 1977 | #3,057 | 26 | 0.0017% |
| 1976 | #4,542 | 14 | 0.0010% |
| 1975 | #4,312 | 15 | 0.0010% |
| 1974 | #3,661 | 18 | 0.0012% |
| 1973 | #3,920 | 16 | 0.0011% |
| 1972 | #3,852 | 16 | 0.0011% |
| 1971 | #3,629 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1970 | #4,003 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 1969 | #3,081 | 20 | 0.0012% |
| 1968 | #2,236 | 30 | 0.0018% |
| 1967 | #2,364 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 1966 | #2,560 | 23 | 0.0014% |
| 1965 | #3,027 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 1964 | #2,185 | 31 | 0.0016% |
| 1963 | #2,598 | 23 | 0.0012% |
| 1962 | #2,249 | 29 | 0.0015% |
| 1961 | #2,237 | 29 | 0.0014% |
| 1960 | #2,084 | 31 | 0.0015% |
| 1959 | #1,909 | 35 | 0.0017% |
| 1958 | #2,061 | 30 | 0.0015% |
| 1957 | #1,920 | 33 | 0.0016% |
| 1956 | #2,441 | 22 | 0.0011% |
| 1955 | #1,495 | 47 | 0.0024% |
| 1954 | #1,794 | 34 | 0.0018% |
| 1953 | #1,778 | 32 | 0.0017% |
| 1952 | #1,771 | 32 | 0.0017% |
| 1951 | #1,552 | 38 | 0.0021% |
| 1950 | #1,673 | 32 | 0.0019% |
| 1949 | #1,799 | 29 | 0.0017% |
| 1948 | #1,813 | 28 | 0.0016% |
| 1947 | #1,715 | 32 | 0.0018% |
| 1946 | #1,462 | 37 | 0.0024% |
| 1945 | #1,653 | 26 | 0.0020% |
| 1944 | #1,361 | 36 | 0.0027% |
| 1943 | #1,141 | 51 | 0.0037% |
| 1942 | #1,191 | 45 | 0.0033% |
| 1941 | #1,238 | 38 | 0.0031% |
| 1940 | #1,214 | 37 | 0.0032% |
| 1939 | #1,465 | 27 | 0.0025% |
| 1938 | #1,638 | 23 | 0.0021% |
| 1937 | #1,351 | 30 | 0.0028% |
| 1936 | #1,313 | 31 | 0.0030% |
| 1935 | #1,410 | 28 | 0.0027% |
| 1934 | #1,121 | 41 | 0.0039% |
| 1933 | #996 | 49 | 0.0049% |
| 1932 | #1,208 | 36 | 0.0034% |
| 1931 | #896 | 60 | 0.0056% |
| 1930 | #990 | 56 | 0.0050% |
| 1929 | #874 | 67 | 0.0060% |
| 1928 | #1,082 | 49 | 0.0042% |
| 1927 | #902 | 69 | 0.0058% |
| 1926 | #1,031 | 53 | 0.0045% |
| 1925 | #1,046 | 53 | 0.0044% |
| 1924 | #1,168 | 46 | 0.0037% |
| 1923 | #1,075 | 51 | 0.0042% |
| 1922 | #961 | 61 | 0.0051% |
| 1921 | #1,090 | 49 | 0.0040% |
| 1920 | #1,114 | 46 | 0.0038% |
| 1919 | #1,119 | 44 | 0.0039% |
| 1918 | #1,120 | 44 | 0.0038% |
| 1917 | #1,178 | 38 | 0.0035% |
| 1916 | #1,185 | 37 | 0.0035% |
| 1915 | #1,023 | 43 | 0.0044% |
| 1914 | #1,430 | 21 | 0.0028% |
| 1913 | #1,458 | 17 | 0.0027% |
| 1912 | #1,289 | 18 | 0.0032% |
| 1911 | #1,066 | 18 | 0.0043% |
| 1910 | #1,749 | 9 | 0.0023% |
| 1909 | #1,739 | 8 | 0.0023% |
| 1908 | #1,826 | 7 | 0.0021% |
| 1907 | #1,131 | 13 | 0.0041% |
| 1906 | #1,400 | 9 | 0.0030% |
| 1905 | #1,399 | 9 | 0.0031% |
| 1904 | #1,086 | 12 | 0.0044% |
| 1902 | #1,203 | 10 | 0.0038% |
| 1901 | #1,317 | 8 | 0.0033% |
| 1900 | #1,899 | 6 | 0.0020% |
| 1899 | #1,373 | 7 | 0.0030% |
| 1898 | #1,162 | 10 | 0.0039% |
| 1897 | #1,153 | 9 | 0.0038% |
| 1895 | #1,111 | 10 | 0.0043% |
| 1894 | #988 | 11 | 0.0049% |
| 1893 | #1,409 | 6 | 0.0028% |
| 1892 | #1,630 | 5 | 0.0024% |
| 1891 | #883 | 11 | 0.0059% |
| 1890 | #866 | 11 | 0.0058% |
| 1889 | #1,254 | 6 | 0.0034% |
| 1888 | #950 | 9 | 0.0050% |
| 1887 | #1,022 | 7 | 0.0048% |
| 1886 | #1,257 | 5 | 0.0035% |
| 1885 | #1,177 | 5 | 0.0038% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #525 | 570 | 0.0334% |
| 2024 | #541 | 552 | 0.0322% |
| 2023 | #556 | 526 | 0.0308% |
| 2022 | #576 | 508 | 0.0291% |
| 2021 | #551 | 519 | 0.0297% |
| 2020 | #573 | 486 | 0.0282% |
| 2019 | #565 | 494 | 0.0275% |
| 2018 | #541 | 520 | 0.0286% |
| 2017 | #535 | 529 | 0.0286% |
| 2016 | #540 | 539 | 0.0284% |
| 2015 | #533 | 534 | 0.0279% |
| 2014 | #531 | 525 | 0.0273% |
| 2013 | #524 | 508 | 0.0269% |
| 2012 | #558 | 466 | 0.0246% |
| 2011 | #566 | 443 | 0.0233% |
| 2010 | #555 | 457 | 0.0238% |
| 2009 | #557 | 473 | 0.0238% |
| 2008 | #496 | 552 | 0.0271% |
| 2007 | #496 | 535 | 0.0258% |
| 2006 | #451 | 599 | 0.0291% |
| 2005 | #473 | 530 | 0.0265% |
| 2004 | #467 | 543 | 0.0274% |
| 2003 | #440 | 570 | 0.0289% |
| 2002 | #439 | 566 | 0.0292% |
| 2001 | #428 | 572 | 0.0294% |
| 2000 | #400 | 638 | 0.0325% |
| 1999 | #393 | 638 | 0.0332% |
| 1998 | #381 | 655 | 0.0343% |
| 1997 | #344 | 749 | 0.0397% |
| 1996 | #345 | 719 | 0.0380% |
| 1995 | #336 | 732 | 0.0385% |
| 1994 | #306 | 862 | 0.0446% |
| 1993 | #306 | 897 | 0.0457% |
| 1992 | #285 | 992 | 0.0497% |
| 1991 | #247 | 1,129 | 0.0559% |
| 1990 | #235 | 1,227 | 0.0597% |
| 1989 | #217 | 1,258 | 0.0629% |
| 1988 | #220 | 1,164 | 0.0608% |
| 1987 | #203 | 1,262 | 0.0676% |
| 1986 | #197 | 1,283 | 0.0697% |
| 1985 | #186 | 1,380 | 0.0747% |
| 1984 | #182 | 1,383 | 0.0766% |
| 1983 | #176 | 1,456 | 0.0812% |
| 1982 | #167 | 1,617 | 0.0891% |
| 1981 | #157 | 1,726 | 0.0964% |
| 1980 | #153 | 1,779 | 0.0997% |
| 1979 | #150 | 1,753 | 0.1018% |
| 1978 | #147 | 1,795 | 0.1093% |
| 1977 | #141 | 1,913 | 0.1164% |
| 1976 | #139 | 1,871 | 0.1192% |
| 1975 | #122 | 2,120 | 0.1358% |
| 1974 | #122 | 2,187 | 0.1391% |
| 1973 | #117 | 2,236 | 0.1435% |
| 1972 | #114 | 2,476 | 0.1527% |
| 1971 | #111 | 2,960 | 0.1674% |
| 1970 | #108 | 3,041 | 0.1636% |
| 1969 | #105 | 3,001 | 0.1678% |
| 1968 | #94 | 3,177 | 0.1828% |
| 1967 | #95 | 3,276 | 0.1879% |
| 1966 | #94 | 3,523 | 0.1975% |
| 1965 | #95 | 3,784 | 0.2034% |
| 1964 | #90 | 4,150 | 0.2083% |
| 1963 | #89 | 4,438 | 0.2185% |
| 1962 | #90 | 4,477 | 0.2164% |
| 1961 | #83 | 4,965 | 0.2338% |
| 1960 | #80 | 5,253 | 0.2464% |
| 1959 | #81 | 5,183 | 0.2428% |
| 1958 | #75 | 5,525 | 0.2603% |
| 1957 | #65 | 6,064 | 0.2811% |
| 1956 | #62 | 6,133 | 0.2899% |
| 1955 | #58 | 6,329 | 0.3073% |
| 1954 | #56 | 6,513 | 0.3195% |
| 1953 | #55 | 6,656 | 0.3375% |
| 1952 | #55 | 6,524 | 0.3357% |
| 1951 | #52 | 6,466 | 0.3434% |
| 1950 | #51 | 6,454 | 0.3605% |
| 1949 | #51 | 6,622 | 0.3733% |
| 1948 | #49 | 7,066 | 0.4027% |
| 1947 | #48 | 7,560 | 0.4132% |
| 1946 | #43 | 6,924 | 0.4264% |
| 1945 | #40 | 6,183 | 0.4594% |
| 1944 | #39 | 6,534 | 0.4794% |
| 1943 | #38 | 6,931 | 0.4856% |
| 1942 | #42 | 6,311 | 0.4569% |
| 1941 | #39 | 5,950 | 0.4844% |
| 1940 | #42 | 5,564 | 0.4800% |
| 1939 | #42 | 5,155 | 0.4657% |
| 1938 | #41 | 5,042 | 0.4546% |
| 1937 | #40 | 4,888 | 0.4583% |
| 1936 | #42 | 4,817 | 0.4644% |
| 1935 | #40 | 4,939 | 0.4743% |
| 1934 | #35 | 5,104 | 0.4943% |
| 1933 | #39 | 4,906 | 0.4948% |
| 1932 | #38 | 5,238 | 0.5017% |
| 1931 | #35 | 5,489 | 0.5280% |
| 1930 | #33 | 5,917 | 0.5392% |
| 1929 | #35 | 5,812 | 0.5403% |
| 1928 | #34 | 6,229 | 0.5624% |
| 1927 | #34 | 6,387 | 0.5668% |
| 1926 | #34 | 6,224 | 0.5605% |
| 1925 | #32 | 6,376 | 0.5714% |
| 1924 | #31 | 6,557 | 0.5789% |
| 1923 | #32 | 6,316 | 0.5762% |
| 1922 | #32 | 6,458 | 0.5935% |
| 1921 | #32 | 6,545 | 0.5942% |
| 1920 | #32 | 6,355 | 0.5971% |
| 1919 | #32 | 5,970 | 0.6091% |
| 1918 | #32 | 6,211 | 0.6128% |
| 1917 | #33 | 5,586 | 0.6036% |
| 1916 | #33 | 5,327 | 0.5985% |
| 1915 | #32 | 5,052 | 0.5954% |
| 1914 | #32 | 3,852 | 0.5883% |
| 1913 | #32 | 3,090 | 0.6029% |
| 1912 | #31 | 2,591 | 0.6026% |
| 1911 | #31 | 1,394 | 0.6169% |
| 1910 | #29 | 1,267 | 0.6524% |
| 1909 | #28 | 1,135 | 0.6921% |
| 1908 | #26 | 1,097 | 0.7108% |
| 1907 | #24 | 1,128 | 0.7683% |
| 1906 | #24 | 1,024 | 0.7690% |
| 1905 | #24 | 1,016 | 0.7679% |
| 1904 | #21 | 1,123 | 0.8765% |
| 1903 | #22 | 975 | 0.8177% |
| 1902 | #22 | 1,002 | 0.8169% |
| 1901 | #20 | 917 | 0.8613% |
| 1900 | #21 | 1,215 | 0.8074% |
| 1899 | #20 | 912 | 0.8587% |
| 1898 | #20 | 1,049 | 0.8550% |
| 1897 | #19 | 999 | 0.8860% |
| 1896 | #19 | 1,027 | 0.8589% |
| 1895 | #19 | 1,028 | 0.8757% |
| 1894 | #18 | 1,018 | 0.8793% |
| 1893 | #18 | 919 | 0.8182% |
| 1892 | #18 | 1,048 | 0.8588% |
| 1891 | #18 | 838 | 0.8281% |
| 1890 | #18 | 941 | 0.8476% |
| 1889 | #18 | 888 | 0.8030% |
| 1888 | #20 | 856 | 0.7083% |
| 1887 | #20 | 726 | 0.7159% |
| 1886 | #20 | 767 | 0.6923% |
| 1885 | #24 | 691 | 0.6410% |
| 1884 | #26 | 680 | 0.5942% |
| 1883 | #30 | 556 | 0.5314% |
| 1882 | #33 | 521 | 0.4583% |
| 1881 | #34 | 440 | 0.4368% |
| 1880 | #37 | 440 | 0.3982% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.