Fun Facts About the Name Todd
- More than 283 thousand babies named Todd: U.S. records list 283,400 babies given the name Todd from 1880 through 2025. Even 1,060 girls received the name Todd - about 1 girl for every 266 boys.
What Does the Name Todd Mean?
Todd is an English name meaning "fox." It comes from the Middle English word todde, meaning "fox." The word was used as a nickname, so the surname Todd originally identified someone who resembled a fox - often in the sense of being sly - or someone who hunted foxes. The deeper origin of todde is not securely settled; it is a Germanic word without a single clearly established source, and some reference works note a possible link to Old Norse words for the fox, such as tófa, a vixen. The English core is clear, since tod remained a dialect word for a fox in parts of England into the modern period.
Todd Name History & Origins
Todd began as a surname, formed from the Middle English nickname todde. Nickname surnames of this kind were common in medieval England: a man called Todde might have been thought fox-like, or might have been a fox hunter. The surname is found in northern England and in Scotland, where the word for fox was in ordinary use. Spelling was not fixed in the Middle Ages, so early forms vary, and the modern spelling Todd settled only gradually.
From the surname, Todd became a masculine given name in the English-speaking world, especially in the United States. The surname is familiar from Mary Ann Todd, who married Abraham Lincoln in 1842 and is usually known as Mary Todd Lincoln; the name was carried on in her family as a middle name, as with her son Robert Todd Lincoln. As a first name, Todd was uncommon before the twentieth century and grew more usual as a general American given name during it. The shortened spelling Tod also appears as a given name.
How Popular is the Name Todd?
Todd recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 1964. Todd entered the top 100 U.S. boy names in 1959.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | #16,427 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1994 | #15,612 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1990 | #11,326 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1989 | #7,996 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1988 | #4,488 | 20 | 0.0011% |
| 1987 | #4,467 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1986 | #6,574 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1985 | #4,277 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1984 | #5,203 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1983 | #3,941 | 20 | 0.0012% |
| 1982 | #2,896 | 32 | 0.0019% |
| 1981 | #3,140 | 28 | 0.0017% |
| 1980 | #3,406 | 25 | 0.0015% |
| 1979 | #3,068 | 28 | 0.0017% |
| 1978 | #2,853 | 29 | 0.0019% |
| 1977 | #3,075 | 26 | 0.0017% |
| 1976 | #2,331 | 36 | 0.0025% |
| 1975 | #2,507 | 32 | 0.0022% |
| 1974 | #2,064 | 41 | 0.0028% |
| 1973 | #1,709 | 53 | 0.0036% |
| 1972 | #1,696 | 53 | 0.0035% |
| 1971 | #2,102 | 40 | 0.0024% |
| 1970 | #1,855 | 48 | 0.0027% |
| 1969 | #1,608 | 56 | 0.0033% |
| 1968 | #1,432 | 63 | 0.0038% |
| 1967 | #1,656 | 48 | 0.0029% |
| 1966 | #1,697 | 45 | 0.0027% |
| 1965 | #1,741 | 43 | 0.0024% |
| 1964 | #1,705 | 47 | 0.0025% |
| 1963 | #2,129 | 32 | 0.0017% |
| 1962 | #2,159 | 31 | 0.0016% |
| 1961 | #2,193 | 30 | 0.0015% |
| 1960 | #3,347 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1959 | #4,009 | 11 | 0.0005% |
| 1958 | #3,532 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1957 | #4,515 | 9 | 0.0004% |
| 1956 | #6,818 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1955 | #5,776 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1953 | #6,444 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,618 | 105 | 0.0061% |
| 2024 | #1,596 | 108 | 0.0063% |
| 2023 | #1,563 | 112 | 0.0066% |
| 2022 | #1,477 | 123 | 0.0071% |
| 2021 | #1,543 | 114 | 0.0065% |
| 2020 | #1,412 | 123 | 0.0071% |
| 2019 | #1,216 | 157 | 0.0088% |
| 2018 | #1,198 | 158 | 0.0087% |
| 2017 | #1,167 | 161 | 0.0087% |
| 2016 | #1,072 | 185 | 0.0098% |
| 2015 | #976 | 212 | 0.0111% |
| 2014 | #1,078 | 180 | 0.0094% |
| 2013 | #969 | 207 | 0.0109% |
| 2012 | #887 | 237 | 0.0125% |
| 2011 | #866 | 244 | 0.0128% |
| 2010 | #814 | 264 | 0.0138% |
| 2009 | #890 | 235 | 0.0118% |
| 2008 | #774 | 287 | 0.0141% |
| 2007 | #711 | 326 | 0.0157% |
| 2006 | #653 | 354 | 0.0172% |
| 2005 | #583 | 390 | 0.0195% |
| 2004 | #535 | 441 | 0.0222% |
| 2003 | #517 | 466 | 0.0236% |
| 2002 | #468 | 510 | 0.0263% |
| 2001 | #457 | 530 | 0.0273% |
| 2000 | #425 | 583 | 0.0297% |
| 1999 | #394 | 627 | 0.0327% |
| 1998 | #365 | 703 | 0.0368% |
| 1997 | #314 | 843 | 0.0447% |
| 1996 | #299 | 890 | 0.0470% |
| 1995 | #271 | 1,028 | 0.0540% |
| 1994 | #252 | 1,141 | 0.0591% |
| 1993 | #235 | 1,238 | 0.0631% |
| 1992 | #216 | 1,425 | 0.0713% |
| 1991 | #179 | 1,743 | 0.0863% |
| 1990 | #159 | 1,976 | 0.0962% |
| 1989 | #146 | 2,125 | 0.1062% |
| 1988 | #135 | 2,201 | 0.1150% |
| 1987 | #120 | 2,355 | 0.1261% |
| 1986 | #110 | 2,585 | 0.1404% |
| 1985 | #99 | 2,939 | 0.1590% |
| 1984 | #92 | 3,105 | 0.1720% |
| 1983 | #87 | 3,337 | 0.1861% |
| 1982 | #82 | 3,600 | 0.1984% |
| 1981 | #74 | 3,953 | 0.2207% |
| 1980 | #75 | 4,128 | 0.2314% |
| 1979 | #60 | 4,984 | 0.2895% |
| 1978 | #56 | 5,497 | 0.3348% |
| 1977 | #50 | 6,278 | 0.3820% |
| 1976 | #50 | 6,441 | 0.4105% |
| 1975 | #43 | 7,152 | 0.4580% |
| 1974 | #39 | 7,846 | 0.4990% |
| 1973 | #35 | 8,678 | 0.5568% |
| 1972 | #31 | 9,968 | 0.6146% |
| 1971 | #30 | 12,056 | 0.6817% |
| 1970 | #28 | 14,425 | 0.7762% |
| 1969 | #28 | 14,748 | 0.8247% |
| 1968 | #28 | 14,659 | 0.8434% |
| 1967 | #29 | 13,454 | 0.7715% |
| 1966 | #29 | 13,557 | 0.7601% |
| 1965 | #30 | 13,934 | 0.7490% |
| 1964 | #28 | 15,349 | 0.7702% |
| 1963 | #30 | 14,789 | 0.7282% |
| 1962 | #30 | 12,751 | 0.6164% |
| 1961 | #46 | 9,753 | 0.4592% |
| 1960 | #71 | 5,750 | 0.2697% |
| 1959 | #99 | 4,332 | 0.2029% |
| 1958 | #116 | 3,467 | 0.1634% |
| 1957 | #143 | 2,405 | 0.1115% |
| 1956 | #156 | 2,008 | 0.0949% |
| 1955 | #173 | 1,615 | 0.0784% |
| 1954 | #195 | 1,291 | 0.0633% |
| 1953 | #207 | 1,102 | 0.0559% |
| 1952 | #213 | 960 | 0.0494% |
| 1951 | #241 | 796 | 0.0423% |
| 1950 | #272 | 593 | 0.0331% |
| 1949 | #317 | 461 | 0.0260% |
| 1948 | #363 | 346 | 0.0197% |
| 1947 | #393 | 304 | 0.0166% |
| 1946 | #413 | 237 | 0.0146% |
| 1945 | #468 | 163 | 0.0121% |
| 1944 | #459 | 176 | 0.0129% |
| 1943 | #486 | 161 | 0.0113% |
| 1942 | #529 | 134 | 0.0097% |
| 1941 | #602 | 99 | 0.0081% |
| 1940 | #641 | 88 | 0.0076% |
| 1939 | #732 | 68 | 0.0061% |
| 1938 | #747 | 68 | 0.0061% |
| 1937 | #866 | 51 | 0.0048% |
| 1936 | #969 | 42 | 0.0040% |
| 1935 | #1,076 | 37 | 0.0036% |
| 1934 | #1,188 | 32 | 0.0031% |
| 1933 | #1,307 | 27 | 0.0027% |
| 1932 | #1,355 | 27 | 0.0026% |
| 1931 | #1,762 | 18 | 0.0017% |
| 1930 | #1,396 | 28 | 0.0026% |
| 1929 | #1,190 | 35 | 0.0033% |
| 1928 | #2,152 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1927 | #2,686 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1926 | #1,713 | 21 | 0.0019% |
| 1925 | #1,796 | 20 | 0.0018% |
| 1924 | #1,284 | 33 | 0.0029% |
| 1923 | #1,691 | 22 | 0.0020% |
| 1922 | #2,135 | 16 | 0.0015% |
| 1921 | #1,410 | 29 | 0.0026% |
| 1920 | #1,500 | 26 | 0.0024% |
| 1919 | #3,099 | 9 | 0.0009% |
| 1918 | #2,154 | 15 | 0.0015% |
| 1917 | #1,639 | 21 | 0.0023% |
| 1916 | #1,642 | 20 | 0.0022% |
| 1915 | #1,656 | 19 | 0.0022% |
| 1914 | #2,255 | 10 | 0.0015% |
| 1913 | #1,933 | 10 | 0.0020% |
| 1911 | #1,373 | 8 | 0.0035% |
| 1907 | #1,527 | 5 | 0.0034% |
| 1904 | #1,385 | 5 | 0.0039% |
| 1903 | #1,120 | 6 | 0.0050% |
| 1900 | #1,151 | 7 | 0.0047% |
| 1887 | #1,057 | 5 | 0.0049% |
| 1882 | #936 | 6 | 0.0053% |
| 1881 | #776 | 7 | 0.0069% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.