Fun Facts About the Name Mel
- More than 4 thousand babies named Mel: U.S. records list 4,202 babies given the name Mel from 1880 through 2025. Even 508 girls received the name Mel - about 1 girl for every 7 boys.
What Does the Name Mel Mean?
Mel is chiefly a shortened form of longer names, so it does not have one fixed meaning. As a masculine name it commonly stands for Melvin, a name whose own etymology is uncertain. As a feminine name it commonly stands for Melanie, from Greek melas, meaning black or dark; Melissa, from Greek melissa, meaning bee; Melinda, of uncertain origin; or Melody, an English word name derived from Greek melōidia, meaning singing or song. The name also appears independently in Irish tradition as the name of Saint Mel of Ardagh, but the origin of that early name is not securely known.
Mel Name History & Origins
As an English given name, Mel is mainly a diminutive, so its history is tied to the longer names it shortens. The masculine Mel usually stands for Melvin, a surname-derived name whose own etymology is disputed between Old English and Gaelic explanations. The feminine Mel usually stands for Melanie, Melissa, or Melinda. Melanie comes from the Greek name Melania, borne by two early Christian saints, Melania the Elder and Melania the Younger. Melissa is an ancient Greek name; Greek myth made Melissa a nymph who fed the infant Zeus with honey. Melinda is a later name whose development is not well documented.
In Ireland, Mel appears as an independent masculine name in the early church. Saint Mel of Ardagh, who died around 490, was a bishop traditionally described as a companion and nephew of Saint Patrick. He is associated with the monastery and diocese of Ardagh in County Longford, and his feast day is 6 February. The Irish form of the name is Mél. The origin of this early name is not securely known; it has sometimes been connected with Gaelic mael, meaning tonsured, but no single derivation is proved.
How Popular is the Name Mel?
Mel recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 1958. Its best rank was #690 in 1958.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #7,031 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 2024 | #6,819 | 17 | 0.0011% |
| 2023 | #7,145 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 2022 | #7,183 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 2021 | #10,059 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2020 | #7,444 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 2019 | #6,609 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 2018 | #17,321 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2016 | #9,859 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2015 | #12,621 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2014 | #18,328 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2013 | #14,141 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2012 | #16,229 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2010 | #18,905 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2009 | #19,222 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2008 | #13,394 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2007 | #11,365 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2006 | #9,704 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 2005 | #8,198 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2004 | #4,572 | 30 | 0.0016% |
| 2003 | #6,490 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 2002 | #5,607 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 1976 | #10,267 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1965 | #6,265 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1964 | #4,865 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1963 | #5,693 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1962 | #3,116 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 1961 | #3,727 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1960 | #3,066 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1959 | #3,751 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1958 | #3,675 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1957 | #2,894 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1956 | #3,624 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1955 | #4,617 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1954 | #6,324 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1953 | #3,402 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1952 | #4,020 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1951 | #5,951 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1949 | #4,529 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1947 | #5,112 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1944 | #4,382 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1943 | #5,130 | 5 | 0.0004% |
| 1939 | #3,668 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1938 | #4,769 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1934 | #4,757 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1933 | #4,648 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1927 | #4,633 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1924 | #5,619 | 5 | 0.0004% |
| 1919 | #4,621 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1916 | #4,237 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #7,508 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2024 | #8,713 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2023 | #8,060 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2022 | #8,749 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2021 | #8,597 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2020 | #10,227 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2019 | #10,449 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2018 | #7,965 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2017 | #11,704 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2016 | #6,995 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 2014 | #11,660 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2013 | #10,355 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2012 | #13,540 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2011 | #7,889 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2010 | #7,413 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2009 | #10,611 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2008 | #6,643 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 2007 | #6,152 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 2006 | #4,984 | 18 | 0.0009% |
| 2005 | #6,947 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2004 | #5,170 | 16 | 0.0008% |
| 2003 | #3,921 | 22 | 0.0011% |
| 2002 | #5,955 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 2001 | #5,901 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 2000 | #5,790 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1999 | #4,269 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 1998 | #5,708 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1997 | #5,167 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1996 | #3,362 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 1995 | #4,434 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1994 | #5,010 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1993 | #4,606 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1992 | #4,763 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1991 | #4,394 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1990 | #3,719 | 16 | 0.0008% |
| 1989 | #3,401 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1988 | #3,824 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1987 | #3,662 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1986 | #4,714 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1985 | #4,237 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1984 | #3,842 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1983 | #3,783 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1982 | #2,570 | 19 | 0.0010% |
| 1981 | #3,152 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1980 | #2,093 | 26 | 0.0015% |
| 1979 | #2,858 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1978 | #2,176 | 22 | 0.0013% |
| 1977 | #2,621 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1976 | #1,696 | 31 | 0.0020% |
| 1975 | #1,616 | 32 | 0.0020% |
| 1974 | #1,772 | 27 | 0.0017% |
| 1973 | #2,097 | 20 | 0.0013% |
| 1972 | #1,446 | 35 | 0.0022% |
| 1971 | #1,620 | 30 | 0.0017% |
| 1970 | #1,409 | 36 | 0.0019% |
| 1969 | #1,145 | 47 | 0.0026% |
| 1968 | #1,304 | 35 | 0.0020% |
| 1967 | #1,027 | 51 | 0.0029% |
| 1966 | #925 | 63 | 0.0035% |
| 1965 | #917 | 66 | 0.0035% |
| 1964 | #845 | 82 | 0.0041% |
| 1963 | #944 | 64 | 0.0032% |
| 1962 | #851 | 79 | 0.0038% |
| 1961 | #765 | 102 | 0.0048% |
| 1960 | #770 | 98 | 0.0046% |
| 1959 | #792 | 94 | 0.0044% |
| 1958 | #690 | 119 | 0.0056% |
| 1957 | #788 | 91 | 0.0042% |
| 1956 | #768 | 93 | 0.0044% |
| 1955 | #898 | 69 | 0.0033% |
| 1954 | #781 | 84 | 0.0041% |
| 1953 | #741 | 94 | 0.0048% |
| 1952 | #799 | 78 | 0.0040% |
| 1951 | #957 | 54 | 0.0029% |
| 1950 | #833 | 67 | 0.0037% |
| 1949 | #819 | 70 | 0.0039% |
| 1948 | #809 | 71 | 0.0040% |
| 1947 | #701 | 98 | 0.0054% |
| 1946 | #702 | 86 | 0.0053% |
| 1945 | #751 | 67 | 0.0050% |
| 1944 | #822 | 59 | 0.0043% |
| 1943 | #776 | 71 | 0.0050% |
| 1942 | #721 | 80 | 0.0058% |
| 1941 | #805 | 62 | 0.0050% |
| 1940 | #755 | 67 | 0.0058% |
| 1939 | #853 | 52 | 0.0047% |
| 1938 | #792 | 61 | 0.0055% |
| 1937 | #966 | 43 | 0.0040% |
| 1936 | #944 | 43 | 0.0041% |
| 1935 | #1,343 | 26 | 0.0025% |
| 1934 | #1,035 | 40 | 0.0039% |
| 1933 | #1,574 | 20 | 0.0020% |
| 1932 | #1,227 | 31 | 0.0030% |
| 1931 | #1,572 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1930 | #1,794 | 18 | 0.0016% |
| 1929 | #2,549 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1928 | #2,229 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1927 | #1,584 | 24 | 0.0021% |
| 1926 | #1,500 | 25 | 0.0023% |
| 1925 | #2,543 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1924 | #2,576 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1923 | #2,407 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1922 | #1,860 | 19 | 0.0017% |
| 1921 | #3,758 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1920 | #2,299 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1919 | #2,225 | 14 | 0.0014% |
| 1918 | #2,043 | 16 | 0.0016% |
| 1917 | #3,115 | 8 | 0.0009% |
| 1916 | #2,222 | 13 | 0.0015% |
| 1915 | #2,137 | 13 | 0.0015% |
| 1914 | #2,215 | 10 | 0.0015% |
| 1913 | #3,108 | 5 | 0.0010% |
| 1912 | #2,783 | 5 | 0.0012% |
| 1911 | #1,173 | 10 | 0.0044% |
| 1904 | #1,031 | 7 | 0.0055% |
| 1903 | #1,246 | 5 | 0.0042% |
| 1902 | #1,252 | 5 | 0.0041% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.