Fun Facts About the Name Jana
- More than 46 thousand babies named Jana: U.S. records list 46,224 babies given the name Jana from 1880 through 2025. Even 39 boys received the name Jana - about 1 boy for every 1,184 girls.
What Does the Name Jana Mean?
Jana is most often a Slavic feminine form of Jan, the short form of Johannes (John), and it carries that name's meaning, "God is gracious." The ultimate source is the Hebrew Yochanan, generally explained as a form of the divine name joined to ḥanan, "to be gracious, to show favor." The name reached Europe through Greek Iōannēs and Latin Iohannes; the shortened Jan became the usual form of John in Czech, Slovak, Polish, Dutch, German, and Scandinavian speech, and the feminine ending -a produced Jana. In Czech and Slovak, Jana is the standard feminine counterpart of Jan.
Jana also has an independent Arabic origin. The Arabic name Janā (جنى) comes from a verb meaning "to gather or pick fruit" and is usually translated "harvest" or "picked fruit." A link sometimes proposed between Jana and Jannah, the Arabic word for "garden" or "paradise," rests on similarity of sound rather than a shared root.
Sanskrit jana, "people" or "race," supplies a third, unrelated source; it also appears in personal names in South Asia. Persian jān, "life" or "soul," is a similar-sounding word used in affectionate address, but it is not the origin of the given name.
Jana Name History & Origins
As a European name, Jana follows the route of John and its short forms. Hebrew Yochanan became Iōannēs in Greek and Iohannes in Latin, and from Latin it entered the Germanic and Slavic languages, where Jan served as the everyday short form. Feminine forms built on Jan - Jana, Janina, Johana - are found in Czech, Slovak, Polish, Slovene, Croatian, Serbian, and Macedonian, and Jana is likewise established in German, Dutch, and Latvian use. In Czech and Slovak, where Jan is the ordinary form of John, Jana is a familiar female name, pronounced "YAH-nah" in those languages.
An older Roman religious use of the name stands apart from these traditions. In Roman religion, Jana (also written Iana) appears as the feminine counterpart of the god Janus and was at times identified with Diana; Latin writers mention the pairing of the two names. No continuous tradition connects this classical name to the modern given names, and the resemblance is coincidental.
In Arabic-speaking communities, Janā is a separate girl's name with its own history, understood as "harvest" or "picked fruit." In South Asia, names built on Sanskrit jana, "people," belong to yet another tradition. The European, Arabic, and South Asian lines of development are unrelated and are joined only by the way the name is written in Latin letters.
How Popular is the Name Jana?
Jana recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 1961. Its best rank was #226 in 1961.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,247 | 181 | 0.0113% |
| 2024 | #1,335 | 171 | 0.0106% |
| 2023 | #1,201 | 200 | 0.0125% |
| 2022 | #1,140 | 214 | 0.0131% |
| 2021 | #1,091 | 227 | 0.0138% |
| 2020 | #1,062 | 234 | 0.0145% |
| 2019 | #1,066 | 237 | 0.0141% |
| 2018 | #981 | 269 | 0.0158% |
| 2017 | #916 | 292 | 0.0169% |
| 2016 | #916 | 301 | 0.0170% |
| 2015 | #1,009 | 266 | 0.0149% |
| 2014 | #1,110 | 229 | 0.0128% |
| 2013 | #1,020 | 244 | 0.0139% |
| 2012 | #1,058 | 238 | 0.0135% |
| 2011 | #1,150 | 213 | 0.0121% |
| 2010 | #1,032 | 242 | 0.0136% |
| 2009 | #1,069 | 239 | 0.0130% |
| 2008 | #1,140 | 226 | 0.0120% |
| 2007 | #1,062 | 247 | 0.0128% |
| 2006 | #1,047 | 245 | 0.0129% |
| 2005 | #972 | 252 | 0.0136% |
| 2004 | #959 | 250 | 0.0136% |
| 2003 | #1,050 | 218 | 0.0119% |
| 2002 | #887 | 254 | 0.0141% |
| 2001 | #940 | 235 | 0.0131% |
| 2000 | #938 | 229 | 0.0126% |
| 1999 | #873 | 247 | 0.0139% |
| 1998 | #858 | 248 | 0.0140% |
| 1997 | #878 | 231 | 0.0133% |
| 1996 | #852 | 234 | 0.0133% |
| 1995 | #753 | 271 | 0.0154% |
| 1994 | #786 | 260 | 0.0146% |
| 1993 | #702 | 305 | 0.0169% |
| 1992 | #658 | 340 | 0.0184% |
| 1991 | #593 | 383 | 0.0204% |
| 1990 | #546 | 433 | 0.0228% |
| 1989 | #488 | 481 | 0.0261% |
| 1988 | #447 | 505 | 0.0284% |
| 1987 | #395 | 582 | 0.0335% |
| 1986 | #352 | 677 | 0.0395% |
| 1985 | #338 | 696 | 0.0404% |
| 1984 | #314 | 757 | 0.0450% |
| 1983 | #310 | 741 | 0.0444% |
| 1982 | #291 | 843 | 0.0498% |
| 1981 | #267 | 939 | 0.0563% |
| 1980 | #247 | 1,046 | 0.0630% |
| 1979 | #226 | 1,161 | 0.0723% |
| 1978 | #248 | 959 | 0.0626% |
| 1977 | #261 | 949 | 0.0619% |
| 1976 | #288 | 798 | 0.0545% |
| 1975 | #291 | 821 | 0.0563% |
| 1974 | #298 | 801 | 0.0546% |
| 1973 | #289 | 827 | 0.0567% |
| 1972 | #291 | 863 | 0.0567% |
| 1971 | #292 | 964 | 0.0579% |
| 1970 | #286 | 1,025 | 0.0586% |
| 1969 | #281 | 1,008 | 0.0598% |
| 1968 | #269 | 1,011 | 0.0616% |
| 1967 | #255 | 1,074 | 0.0651% |
| 1966 | #250 | 1,139 | 0.0673% |
| 1965 | #260 | 1,094 | 0.0620% |
| 1964 | #252 | 1,227 | 0.0648% |
| 1963 | #240 | 1,311 | 0.0680% |
| 1962 | #242 | 1,312 | 0.0667% |
| 1961 | #226 | 1,457 | 0.0722% |
| 1960 | #295 | 980 | 0.0485% |
| 1959 | #296 | 938 | 0.0464% |
| 1958 | #296 | 910 | 0.0452% |
| 1957 | #316 | 848 | 0.0415% |
| 1956 | #305 | 841 | 0.0419% |
| 1955 | #295 | 868 | 0.0444% |
| 1954 | #293 | 846 | 0.0436% |
| 1953 | #319 | 655 | 0.0348% |
| 1952 | #371 | 500 | 0.0270% |
| 1951 | #434 | 371 | 0.0206% |
| 1950 | #465 | 307 | 0.0179% |
| 1949 | #466 | 297 | 0.0174% |
| 1948 | #472 | 288 | 0.0170% |
| 1947 | #563 | 230 | 0.0130% |
| 1946 | #608 | 171 | 0.0109% |
| 1945 | #614 | 140 | 0.0107% |
| 1944 | #646 | 131 | 0.0099% |
| 1943 | #609 | 154 | 0.0110% |
| 1942 | #634 | 141 | 0.0104% |
| 1941 | #906 | 66 | 0.0055% |
| 1940 | #1,109 | 43 | 0.0038% |
| 1939 | #1,280 | 34 | 0.0031% |
| 1938 | #1,134 | 41 | 0.0037% |
| 1937 | #1,136 | 40 | 0.0038% |
| 1936 | #1,306 | 31 | 0.0030% |
| 1935 | #1,695 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1934 | #2,035 | 16 | 0.0015% |
| 1933 | #3,948 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1932 | #1,580 | 24 | 0.0022% |
| 1931 | #2,872 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1929 | #3,525 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1928 | #2,867 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1927 | #4,536 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1926 | #4,547 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1925 | #3,848 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1924 | #4,198 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1923 | #4,162 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1922 | #4,707 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1921 | #5,486 | 5 | 0.0004% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | #5,585 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1985 | #5,406 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1980 | #6,672 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1977 | #5,430 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1970 | #5,045 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1963 | #2,945 | 9 | 0.0004% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.